Consecutive data packet feedback

ABSTRACT

Apparatuses, methods, and systems are disclosed for consecutive data packet feedback. One method includes receiving a first set of consecutive data packets. The method includes transmitting feedback corresponding to the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein the feedback comprises: an error indication in response each data packet in the first set of consecutive data packets failing to be received correctly; a non-error indication in response to at least one data packet in the first set of consecutive data packets being received correctly; a counter value that indicates a consecutive number of data packet failures; or some combination thereof.

FIELD

The subject matter disclosed herein relates generally to wirelesscommunications and more particularly relates to consecutive data packetfeedback.

BACKGROUND

The following abbreviations are herewith defined, at least some of whichare referred to within the following description: Third GenerationPartnership Project (“3GPP”), 4^(th) Generation (“4G”), 5^(th)Generation (“5G”), 5G System (“5GS”), Positive-Acknowledgment (“ACK”),Aggregation Level (“AL”), Access and Mobility Management Function(“AMF”), Access Network (“AN”), Access Point (“AP”), AuthenticationServer Function (“AUSF”), Beam Failure Detection (“BFD”), Binary PhaseShift Keying (“BPSK”), Base Station (“BS”), Buffer Status Report(“BSR”), Bandwidth (“BW”), Bandwidth Part (“BWP”), Carrier Aggregation(“CA”), Contention-Based Random Access (“CBRA”), Clear ChannelAssessment (“CCA”), Control Channel Element (“CCE”), Cyclic DelayDiversity (“CDD”), Code Division Multiple Access (“CDMA”), ControlElement (“CE”), Contention-Free Random Access (“CFRA”), Configured Grant(“CG”), Closed-Loop (“CL”), Core Network (“CN”), Coordinated Multipoint(“CoMP”), Cyclic Prefix (“CP”), Cyclical Redundancy Check (“CRC”),Channel State Information (“CSI”), Channel State Information-ReferenceSignal (“CSI-RS”), Candidate Single-subframe Resources (“CSRs”), CommonSearch Space (“CSS”), Control Resource Set (“CORESET”), Device-to-Device(“D2D”), Discrete Fourier Transform Spread (“DFTS”), Downlink ControlInformation (“DCI”), Dynamic Grant (“DG”), Downlink (“DL”), DemodulationReference Signal (“DMRS”), Data Radio Bearer (“DRB”), DiscontinuousReception (“DRX”), Downlink Pilot Time Slot (“DwPTS”), Enhanced ClearChannel Assessment (“eCCA”), EPS Connection Management (“ECM”), EnhancedMobile Broadband (“eMBB”), Evolved Node B (“eNB”), Effective IsotropicRadiated Power (“EIRP”), European Telecommunications Standards Institute(“ETSI”), Evolved Packet Core (“EPC”), Evolved Packet System (“EPS”),Evolved Universal Terrestrial Access (“E-UTRA”), Evolved UniversalTerrestrial Access Network (“E-UTRAN”), Frame Based Equipment (“FBE”),Frequency Division Duplex (“FDD”), Frequency Division Multiplexing(“FDM”), Frequency Division Multiple Access (“FDMA”), Frequency DivisionOrthogonal Cover Code (“FD-OCC”), 5G Node B or Next Generation Node B(“gNB”), Group Leader (“GL”), General Packet Radio Services (“GPRS”),Guard Period (“GP”), Global System for Mobile Communications (“GSM”),Globally Unique Temporary UE Identifier (“GUTI”), Home AMF (“hAMF”),Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (“HARQ”), Home Location Register(“HLR”), Home PLMN (“HPLMN”), Home Subscriber Server (“HSS”), Identityor Identifier (“ID”), Information Element (“IE”), IndustrialInternet-of-Things (“IIoT”), International Mobile Equipment Identity(“IMEI”), International Mobile Subscriber Identity (“IMSI”),International Mobile Telecommunications (“IMT”), Internet-of-Things(“IoT”), Intelligent Transportation Systems Application Identifier(“ITS-AID”), Key Performance Indicator (“KPI”), Layer 1 (“L1”), Layer 2(“L2”), Layer 3 (“L3”), Licensed Assisted Access (“LAA”), Load BasedEquipment (“LBE”), Listen-Before-Talk (“LBT”), Logical Channel (“LCH”),Logical Channel Prioritization (“LCP”), Log-Likelihood Ratio (“LLR”),Long Term Evolution (“LTE”), Multiple TRP (“M-TRP”), Multiple Access(“MA”), Medium Access Control (“MAC”), Multimedia Broadcast MulticastServices (“MBMS”), Minimum Communication Range (“MCR”), ModulationCoding Scheme (“MCS”), Master Information Block (“MIB”), Multiple InputMultiple Output (“MIMO”), Mobility Management (“MM”), MobilityManagement Entity (“MME”), Mobile Network Operator (“MNO”), massive MTC(“mMTC”), Maximum Power Reduction (“MPR”), Machine Type Communication(“MTC”), Multi User Shared Access (“MUSA”), Non Access Stratum (“NAS”),Narrowband (“NB”), Negative-Acknowledgment or Non-Acknowledgment(“NACK”) or (“NAK”), New Data Indicator (“NDI”), Network Entity (“NE”),Network Function (“NF”), Next Generation RAN (“NG-RAN”), Non-OrthogonalMultiple Access (“NOMA”), New Radio (“NR”), Network Repository Function(“NRF”), Network Slice Instance (“NSI”), Network Slice SelectionAssistance Information (“NSSAI”), Network Slice Selection Function(“NSSF”), Network Slice Selection Policy (“NSSP”), Operation andMaintenance System (“OAM”), Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing(“OFDM”), Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access (“OFDMA”),Open-Loop (“OL”), Other System Information (“OSI”), Power AngularSpectrum (“PAS”), Physical Broadcast Channel (“PBCH”), Power Control(“PC”), LTE-to-V2X Interface (“PC5”), Primary Cell (“PCell”), PolicyControl Function (““PCF”), Physical Cell ID (“PCID”), Physical DownlinkControl Channel (“PDCCH”), Packet Data Convergence Protocol (“PDCP”),Physical Downlink Shared Channel (“PDSCH”), Pattern Division MultipleAccess (“PDMA”), Packet Data Unit (“PDU”), Physical Hybrid ARQ IndicatorChannel (“PHICH”), Power Headroom (“PH”), Power Headroom Report (“PHR”),Physical Layer (“PHY”), Platoon Leader (“PL”), Public Land MobileNetwork (“PLMN”), Platoon Member (“PM”), Physical Random Access Channel(“PRACH”), Physical Resource Block (“PRB”), Primary Secondary Cell(“PSCell”), Physical Sidelink Control Channel (“PSCCH”), PhysicalSidelink Feedback Channel (“PSFCH”), Provider Service Identifier(“PSID”), Physical Uplink Control Channel (“PUCCH”), Physical UplinkShared Channel (“PUSCH”), Quasi Co-Located (“QCL”), Quality of Service(“QoS”), Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (“QPSK”), Registration Area(“RA”), Radio Access Network (“RAN”), Radio Access Technology (“RAT”),Random Access Procedure (“RACH”), Random Access Response (“RAR”),Resource Element Group (“REG”), Radio Link Control (“RLC”), Radio LinkMonitoring (“RLM”), Radio Network Temporary Identifier (“RNTI”),Reference Signal (“RS”), Remaining Minimum System Information (“RMSI”),Radio Resource Control (“RRC”), Radio Resource Management (“RIM”),Resource Spread Multiple Access (“RSMA”), Reference Signal ReceivedPower (“RSRP”), Round Trip Time (“RTT”), Receive (“RX”), Sparse CodeMultiple Access (“SCMA”), Space Division Multiplexing (“SDM”),Scheduling Request (“SR”), Sounding Reference Signal (“SRS”), SingleCarrier Frequency Division Multiple Access (“SC-FDMA”), Secondary Cell(“SCell”), Shared Channel (“SCH”), Sidelink Control Information (“SCI”),Sub-carrier Spacing (“SCS”), Service Data Unit (“SDU”), SystemInformation Block (“SIB”), SystemInformationBlockType1 (“SIB1”),SystemInformationBlockType2 (“SIB2”), Subscriber Identity/IdentificationModule (“SIM”), Signal-to-Interference-Plus-Noise Ratio (“SINR”),Sidelink (“SL”), Service Level Agreement (“SLA”), Sidelink Slot FormatIndicator (“SL-SFI”), Session Management Function (“SMF”), Special Cell(“SpCell”), Single Network Slice Selection Assistance Information(“S-NSSAI”), Shortened TTI (“sTTI”), Semi-Persistent Scheduling (“SPS”),Sidelink RSRP (“S-RSRP”), Synchronization Signal (“SS”), SynchronizationSignal Block (“SSB”), Survival Time (“ST”), Scheduling UE (“SUE”),Supplementary Uplink (“SUL”), Subscriber Permanent Identifier (“SUPI”),Candidate Resource Selection Time Window (“T2”), Tracking Area (“TA”),TA Indicator (“TAI”), Transport Block (“TB”), Transport Block Size (“TBS”), Transmission Configuration Indicator (“TCI”), Time-Division Duplex(“TDD”), Time Division Multiplexing (“TDM”), Time Division OrthogonalCover Code (“TD-OCC”), Time Division Resource Allocation (“TDRA”),Transmission Power Control (“TPC”), Transmission and Reception Point(“TRP”), Time Sensitive Communication (“TSC”), Time SensitiveCommunication Assistance Information (“TSCAI”), Transmission TimeInterval (“TTI”), Time to Live (“TTL”), Transmit (“TX”), Uplink ControlInformation (“UCI”), Unified Data Management Function (“UDM”), UnifiedData Repository (“UDR”), User Entity/Equipment (Mobile Terminal) (“UE”),Universal Integrated Circuit Card (“UICC”), Uplink (“UL”), UniversalMobile Telecommunications System (“UMTS”), User Plane (“UP”), UplinkPilot Time Slot (“UpPTS”), Ultra-reliability and Low-latencyCommunications (“URLLC”), UE Route Selection Policy (“URSP”), LTE RadioInterface (“Uu”), Vehicle-To-Everything (“V2X”), Visiting AMF (“vAMF”),Visiting NSSF (“vNSSF”), Visiting PLMN (“VPLMN”), InterconnectingInterface (“X2”) (“Xn”), and Worldwide Interoperability for MicrowaveAccess (“WiMAX”).

In certain wireless communications networks, feedback may be used. Insuch networks, feedback may not take into account survival time as a QoSrequirement.

BRIEF SUMMARY

Methods for consecutive data packet feedback are disclosed. Apparatusesand systems also perform the functions of the method. One embodiment ofa method includes receiving a first set of consecutive data packets. Incertain embodiments, the method includes transmitting feedbackcorresponding to the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein thefeedback comprises: an error indication in response each data packet inthe first set of consecutive data packets failing to be receivedcorrectly; a non-error indication in response to at least one datapacket in the first set of consecutive data packets being receivedcorrectly; a counter value that indicates a consecutive number of datapacket failures; or some combination thereof.

One apparatus for consecutive data packet feedback includes a receiverthat receives a first set of consecutive data packets. In someembodiments, the apparatus includes a transmitter that transmitsfeedback corresponding to the first set of consecutive data packets,wherein the feedback comprises: an error indication in response eachdata packet in the first set of consecutive data packets failing to bereceived correctly; a non-error indication in response to at least onedata packet in the first set of consecutive data packets being receivedcorrectly; a counter value that indicates a consecutive number of datapacket failures; or some combination thereof.

One embodiment of a method for consecutive data packet feedback includesconfiguring a first plurality of uplink data packets consecutively. Incertain embodiments, the method includes counting a number ofconsecutive data packets of the first plurality of uplink data packetslost from a user equipment. In some embodiments, the method includes, inresponse to the number of consecutive data packets reaching apredetermined threshold, configuring repetition of subsequent uplinkdata packets transmitted from the user equipment.

One apparatus for consecutive data packet feedback includes a processorthat: configures a first plurality of uplink data packets consecutively;counts a number of consecutive data packets of the first plurality ofuplink data packets lost from a user equipment; and, in response to thenumber of consecutive data packets reaching a predetermined threshold,configures repetition of subsequent uplink data packets transmitted fromthe user equipment.

One embodiment of a method for consecutive data packet feedback includesconfiguring a first plurality of data packets to be transmittedconsecutively. In certain embodiments, the method includes determining anumber of consecutive data packets of the first plurality of datapackets lost. In some embodiments, the method includes, in response tothe number of consecutive data packets being less than a predeterminedthreshold, reducing a number of subsequent data packets to betransmitted consecutively.

One apparatus for consecutive data packet feedback includes a processorthat: configures a first plurality of data packets to be transmittedconsecutively; determines a number of consecutive data packets of thefirst plurality of data packets lost; and, in response to the number ofconsecutive data packets being less than a predetermined threshold,reduces a number of subsequent data packets to be transmittedconsecutively.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A more particular description of the embodiments briefly described abovewill be rendered by reference to specific embodiments that areillustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawingsdepict only some embodiments and are not therefore to be considered tobe limiting of scope, the embodiments will be described and explainedwith additional specificity and detail through the use of theaccompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating one embodiment of awireless communication system for consecutive data packet feedback;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating one embodiment of anapparatus that may be used for consecutive data packet feedback;

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram illustrating another embodiment ofan apparatus that may be used for consecutive data packet feedback;

FIG. 4 is a timing diagram illustrating one embodiment ofhigh-resolution feedback having a fixed interval;

FIG. 5 is a timing diagram illustrating one embodiment ofhigh-resolution feedback having a variable interval;

FIG. 6 is a timing diagram illustrating one embodiment of dynamicallyadjusted high-resolution feedback;

FIG. 7 is a communication diagram illustrating one embodiment ofcommunications in which multiple TRPs transmit consecutive DL packets;

FIG. 8 is a communication diagram illustrating one embodiment ofcommunications in which packet repetition is used in response to afeedback error;

FIG. 9 is a communication diagram illustrating one embodiment ofcommunications including error state extraction based on HARQ;

FIG. 10 is a communication diagram illustrating one embodiment ofcommunications that may include DL packet discarding;

FIG. 11 is a communication diagram illustrating one embodiment ofcommunications in which there is consecutive UL packet transmission tomultiple TRPs;

FIG. 12 is a flow chart diagram illustrating one embodiment of a methodfor consecutive data packet feedback;

FIG. 13 is a flow chart diagram illustrating another embodiment of amethod for consecutive data packet feedback; and

FIG. 14 is a flow chart diagram illustrating a further embodiment of amethod for consecutive data packet feedback.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As will be appreciated by one skilled in the art, aspects of theembodiments may be embodied as a system, apparatus, method, or programproduct. Accordingly, embodiments may take the form of an entirelyhardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment (includingfirmware, resident software, micro-code, etc.) or an embodimentcombining software and hardware aspects that may all generally bereferred to herein as a “circuit,” “module” or “system.” Furthermore,embodiments may take the form of a program product embodied in one ormore computer readable storage devices storing machine readable code,computer readable code, and/or program code, referred hereafter as code.The storage devices may be tangible, non-transitory, and/ornon-transmission. The storage devices may not embody signals. In acertain embodiment, the storage devices only employ signals foraccessing code.

Certain of the functional units described in this specification may belabeled as modules, in order to more particularly emphasize theirimplementation independence. For example, a module may be implemented asa hardware circuit comprising custom very-large-scale integration(“VLSI”) circuits or gate arrays, off-the-shelf semiconductors such aslogic chips, transistors, or other discrete components. A module mayalso be implemented in programmable hardware devices such as fieldprogrammable gate arrays, programmable array logic, programmable logicdevices or the like.

Modules may also be implemented in code and/or software for execution byvarious types of processors. An identified module of code may, forinstance, include one or more physical or logical blocks of executablecode which may, for instance, be organized as an object, procedure, orfunction. Nevertheless, the executables of an identified module need notbe physically located together, but may include disparate instructionsstored in different locations which, when joined logically together,include the module and achieve the stated purpose for the module.

Indeed, a module of code may be a single instruction, or manyinstructions, and may even be distributed over several different codesegments, among different programs, and across several memory devices.Similarly, operational data may be identified and illustrated hereinwithin modules, and may be embodied in any suitable form and organizedwithin any suitable type of data structure. The operational data may becollected as a single data set, or may be distributed over differentlocations including over different computer readable storage devices.Where a module or portions of a module are implemented in software, thesoftware portions are stored on one or more computer readable storagedevices.

Any combination of one or more computer readable medium may be utilized.The computer readable medium may be a computer readable storage medium.The computer readable storage medium may be a storage device storing thecode. The storage device may be, for example, but not limited to, anelectronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, holographic,micromechanical, or semiconductor system, apparatus, or device, or anysuitable combination of the foregoing.

More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the storage devicewould include the following: an electrical connection having one or morewires, a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory(“RAM”), a read-only memory (“ROM”), an erasable programmable read-onlymemory (“EPROM” or Flash memory), a portable compact disc read-onlymemory (“CD-ROM”), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device,or any suitable combination of the foregoing. In the context of thisdocument, a computer readable storage medium may be any tangible mediumthat can contain, or store a program for use by or in connection with aninstruction execution system, apparatus, or device.

Code for carrying out operations for embodiments may be any number oflines and may be written in any combination of one or more programminglanguages including an object oriented programming language such asPython, Ruby, Java, Smalltalk, C++, or the like, and conventionalprocedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language,or the like, and/or machine languages such as assembly languages. Thecode may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user'scomputer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user'scomputer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remotecomputer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may beconnected to the user's computer through any type of network, includinga local area network (“LAN”) or a wide area network (“WAN”), or theconnection may be made to an external computer (for example, through theInternet using an Internet Service Provider).

Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment,” “anembodiment,” or similar language means that a particular feature,structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodimentis included in at least one embodiment. Thus, appearances of the phrases“in one embodiment,” “in an embodiment,” and similar language throughoutthis specification may, but do not necessarily, all refer to the sameembodiment, but mean “one or more but not all embodiments” unlessexpressly specified otherwise. The terms “including,” “comprising,”“having,” and variations thereof mean “including but not limited to,”unless expressly specified otherwise. An enumerated listing of itemsdoes not imply that any or all of the items are mutually exclusive,unless expressly specified otherwise. The terms “a,” “an,” and “the”also refer to “one or more” unless expressly specified otherwise.

Furthermore, the described features, structures, or characteristics ofthe embodiments may be combined in any suitable manner. In the followingdescription, numerous specific details are provided, such as examples ofprogramming, software modules, user selections, network transactions,database queries, database structures, hardware modules, hardwarecircuits, hardware chips, etc., to provide a thorough understanding ofembodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however,that embodiments may be practiced without one or more of the specificdetails, or with other methods, components, materials, and so forth. Inother instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are notshown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of anembodiment.

Aspects of the embodiments are described below with reference toschematic flowchart diagrams and/or schematic block diagrams of methods,apparatuses, systems, and program products according to embodiments. Itwill be understood that each block of the schematic flowchart diagramsand/or schematic block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in theschematic flowchart diagrams and/or schematic block diagrams, can beimplemented by code. The code may be provided to a processor of ageneral purpose computer, special purpose computer, or otherprogrammable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such thatthe instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer orother programmable data processing apparatus, create means forimplementing the functions/acts specified in the schematic flowchartdiagrams and/or schematic block diagrams block or blocks.

The code may also be stored in a storage device that can direct acomputer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other devicesto function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored inthe storage device produce an article of manufacture includinginstructions which implement the function/act specified in the schematicflowchart diagrams and/or schematic block diagrams block or blocks.

The code may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable dataprocessing apparatus, or other devices to cause a series of operationalsteps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus orother devices to produce a computer implemented process such that thecode which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatusprovide processes for implementing the functions/acts specified in theflowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.

The schematic flowchart diagrams and/or schematic block diagrams in theFigures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation ofpossible implementations of apparatuses, systems, methods and programproducts according to various embodiments. In this regard, each block inthe schematic flowchart diagrams and/or schematic block diagrams mayrepresent a module, segment, or portion of code, which includes one ormore executable instructions of the code for implementing the specifiedlogical function(s).

It should also be noted that, in some alternative implementations, thefunctions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in theFigures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, beexecuted substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes beexecuted in the reverse order, depending upon the functionalityinvolved. Other steps and methods may be conceived that are equivalentin function, logic, or effect to one or more blocks, or portionsthereof, of the illustrated Figures.

Although various arrow types and line types may be employed in theflowchart and/or block diagrams, they are understood not to limit thescope of the corresponding embodiments. Indeed, some arrows or otherconnectors may be used to indicate only the logical flow of the depictedembodiment. For instance, an arrow may indicate a waiting or monitoringperiod of unspecified duration between enumerated steps of the depictedembodiment. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagramsand/or flowchart diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the blockdiagrams and/or flowchart diagrams, can be implemented by specialpurpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions oracts, or combinations of special purpose hardware and code.

The description of elements in each figure may refer to elements ofproceeding figures. Like numbers refer to like elements in all figures,including alternate embodiments of like elements.

FIG. 1 depicts an embodiment of a wireless communication system 100 forconsecutive data packet feedback. In one embodiment, the wirelesscommunication system 100 includes remote units 102 and network units104. Even though a specific number of remote units 102 and network units104 are depicted in FIG. 1, one of skill in the art will recognize thatany number of remote units 102 and network units 104 may be included inthe wireless communication system 100.

In one embodiment, the remote units 102 may include computing devices,such as desktop computers, laptop computers, personal digital assistants(“PDAs”), tablet computers, smart phones, smart televisions (e.g.,televisions connected to the Internet), set-top boxes, game consoles,security systems (including security cameras), vehicle on-boardcomputers, network devices (e.g., routers, switches, modems), aerialvehicles, drones, or the like. In some embodiments, the remote units 102include wearable devices, such as smart watches, fitness bands, opticalhead-mounted displays, or the like. Moreover, the remote units 102 maybe referred to as subscriber units, mobiles, mobile stations, users,terminals, mobile terminals, fixed terminals, subscriber stations, UE,user terminals, a device, or by other terminology used in the art. Theremote units 102 may communicate directly with one or more of thenetwork units 104 via UL communication signals. The remote units 102 mayalso communicate directly with one or more of the other remote units102.

The network units 104 may be distributed over a geographic region. Incertain embodiments, a network unit 104 may also be referred to as anaccess point, an access terminal, a base, a base station, a Node-B, aneNB, a gNB, a Home Node-B, a relay node, a device, a core network, anaerial server, a radio access node, an AP, NR, a network entity, an AMF,a UDM, a UDR, a UDM/UDR, a PCF, a RAN, an NSSF, or by any otherterminology used in the art. The network units 104 are generally part ofa radio access network that includes one or more controllerscommunicably coupled to one or more corresponding network units 104. Theradio access network is generally communicably coupled to one or morecore networks, which may be coupled to other networks, like the Internetand public switched telephone networks, among other networks. These andother elements of radio access and core networks are not illustrated butare well known generally by those having ordinary skill in the art.

In one implementation, the wireless communication system 100 iscompliant with NR protocols standardized in 3GPP, wherein the networkunit 104 transmits using an OFDM modulation scheme on the DL and theremote units 102 transmit on the UL using a SC-FDMA scheme or an OFDMscheme. More generally, however, the wireless communication system 100may implement some other open or proprietary communication protocol, forexample, WiMAX, IEEE 802.11 variants, GSM, GPRS, UMTS, LTE variants,CDMA2000, Bluetooth®, ZigBee, Sigfoxx, among other protocols. Thepresent disclosure is not intended to be limited to the implementationof any particular wireless communication system architecture orprotocol.

The network units 104 may serve a number of remote units 102 within aserving area, for example, a cell or a cell sector via a wirelesscommunication link. The network units 104 transmit DL communicationsignals to serve the remote units 102 in the time, frequency, and/orspatial domain.

In one embodiment, a remote unit 102 may receive a first set ofconsecutive data packets. In certain embodiments, the remote unit 102may transmit feedback corresponding to the first set of consecutive datapackets, wherein the feedback comprises: an error indication in responseeach data packet in the first set of consecutive data packets failing tobe received correctly; a non-error indication in response to at leastone data packet in the first set of consecutive data packets beingreceived correctly; a counter value that indicates a consecutive numberof data packet failures; or some combination thereof. Accordingly, theremote unit 102 may be used for consecutive data packet feedback.

In another embodiment, a network unit 104 may configure a firstplurality of uplink data packets consecutively. In certain embodiments,the network unit 104 may count a number of consecutive data packets ofthe first plurality of uplink data packets lost from a user equipment.In some embodiments, the network unit 104 may, in response to the numberof consecutive data packets reaching a predetermined threshold,configure repetition of subsequent uplink data packets transmitted fromthe user equipment. Accordingly, the network unit 104 may be used forconsecutive data packet feedback.

In one embodiment, a remote unit 102 and/or a network unit 104 mayconfigure a first plurality of data packets to be transmittedconsecutively. In certain embodiments, the remote unit 102 and/or thenetwork unit 104 may determine a number of consecutive data packets ofthe first plurality of data packets lost. In some embodiments, theremote unit 102 and/or the network unit 104 may, in response to thenumber of consecutive data packets being less than a predeterminedthreshold, reduce a number of subsequent data packets to be transmittedconsecutively. Accordingly, the remote unit 102 and/or the network unit104 may be used for consecutive data packet feedback.

FIG. 2 depicts one embodiment of an apparatus 200 that may be used forconsecutive data packet feedback. The apparatus 200 includes oneembodiment of the remote unit 102. Furthermore, the remote unit 102 mayinclude a processor 202, a memory 204, an input device 206, a display208, a transmitter 210, and a receiver 212. In some embodiments, theinput device 206 and the display 208 are combined into a single device,such as a touchscreen. In certain embodiments, the remote unit 102 maynot include any input device 206 and/or display 208. In variousembodiments, the remote unit 102 may include one or more of theprocessor 202, the memory 204, the transmitter 210, and the receiver212, and may not include the input device 206 and/or the display 208.

The processor 202, in one embodiment, may include any known controllercapable of executing computer-readable instructions and/or capable ofperforming logical operations. For example, the processor 202 may be amicrocontroller, a microprocessor, a central processing unit (“CPU”), agraphics processing unit (“GPU”), an auxiliary processing unit, a fieldprogrammable gate array (“FPGA”), or similar programmable controller. Insome embodiments, the processor 202 executes instructions stored in thememory 204 to perform the methods and routines described herein. Invarious embodiments, the processor 202: configures a first plurality ofdata packets to be transmitted consecutively; determines a number ofconsecutive data packets of the first plurality of data packets lost;and, in response to the number of consecutive data packets being lessthan a predetermined threshold, reduces a number of subsequent datapackets to be transmitted consecutively. The processor 202 iscommunicatively coupled to the memory 204, the input device 206, thedisplay 208, the transmitter 210, and the receiver 212.

The memory 204, in one embodiment, is a computer readable storagemedium. In some embodiments, the memory 204 includes volatile computerstorage media. For example, the memory 204 may include a RAM, includingdynamic RAM (“DRAM”), synchronous dynamic RAM (“SDRAM”), and/or staticRAM (“SRAM”). In some embodiments, the memory 204 includes non-volatilecomputer storage media. For example, the memory 204 may include a harddisk drive, a flash memory, or any other suitable non-volatile computerstorage device. In some embodiments, the memory 204 includes bothvolatile and non-volatile computer storage media. In some embodiments,the memory 204 also stores program code and related data, such as anoperating system or other controller algorithms operating on the remoteunit 102.

The input device 206, in one embodiment, may include any known computerinput device including a touch panel, a button, a keyboard, a stylus, amicrophone, or the like. In some embodiments, the input device 206 maybe integrated with the display 208, for example, as a touchscreen orsimilar touch-sensitive display. In some embodiments, the input device206 includes a touchscreen such that text may be input using a virtualkeyboard displayed on the touchscreen and/or by handwriting on thetouchscreen. In some embodiments, the input device 206 includes two ormore different devices, such as a keyboard and a touch panel.

The display 208, in one embodiment, may include any known electronicallycontrollable display or display device. The display 208 may be designedto output visual, audible, and/or haptic signals. In some embodiments,the display 208 includes an electronic display capable of outputtingvisual data to a user. For example, the display 208 may include, but isnot limited to, an LCD display, an LED display, an OLED display, aprojector, or similar display device capable of outputting images, text,or the like to a user. As another, non-limiting, example, the display208 may include a wearable display such as a smart watch, smart glasses,a heads-up display, or the like. Further, the display 208 may be acomponent of a smart phone, a personal digital assistant, a television,a table computer, a notebook (laptop) computer, a personal computer, avehicle dashboard, or the like.

In certain embodiments, the display 208 includes one or more speakersfor producing sound. For example, the display 208 may produce an audiblealert or notification (e.g., a beep or chime). In some embodiments, thedisplay 208 includes one or more haptic devices for producingvibrations, motion, or other haptic feedback. In some embodiments, allor portions of the display 208 may be integrated with the input device206. For example, the input device 206 and display 208 may form atouchscreen or similar touch-sensitive display. In other embodiments,the display 208 may be located near the input device 206.

The transmitter 210 is used to provide UL communication signals to thenetwork unit 104 and the receiver 212 is used to receive DLcommunication signals from the network unit 104, as described herein. Insome embodiments, the receiver 212 receives a first set of consecutivedata packets. In some embodiments, the transmitter 210 transmitsfeedback corresponding to the first set of consecutive data packets,wherein the feedback comprises: an error indication in response eachdata packet in the first set of consecutive data packets failing to bereceived correctly; a non-error indication in response to at least onedata packet in the first set of consecutive data packets being receivedcorrectly; a counter value that indicates a consecutive number of datapacket failures; or some combination thereof.

Although only one transmitter 210 and one receiver 212 are illustrated,the remote unit 102 may have any suitable number of transmitters 210 andreceivers 212. The transmitter 210 and the receiver 212 may be anysuitable type of transmitters and receivers. In one embodiment, thetransmitter 210 and the receiver 212 may be part of a transceiver.

FIG. 3 depicts one embodiment of an apparatus 300 that may be used forconsecutive data packet feedback. The apparatus 300 includes oneembodiment of the network unit 104. Furthermore, the network unit 104may include a processor 302, a memory 304, an input device 306, adisplay 308, a transmitter 310, and a receiver 312. As may beappreciated, the processor 302, the memory 304, the input device 306,the display 308, the transmitter 310, and the receiver 312 may besubstantially similar to the processor 202, the memory 204, the inputdevice 206, the display 208, the transmitter 210, and the receiver 212of the remote unit 102, respectively.

In some embodiments, the processor 302: configures a first plurality ofuplink data packets consecutively; counts a number of consecutive datapackets of the first plurality of uplink data packets lost from a userequipment; and, in response to the number of consecutive data packetsreaching a predetermined threshold, configures repetition of subsequentuplink data packets transmitted from the user equipment.

In various embodiments, the processor 302: configures a first pluralityof data packets to be transmitted consecutively; determines a number ofconsecutive data packets of the first plurality of data packets lost;and, in response to the number of consecutive data packets being lessthan a predetermined threshold, reduces a number of subsequent datapackets to be transmitted consecutively. Although only one transmitter310 and one receiver 312 are illustrated, the network unit 104 may haveany suitable number of transmitters 310 and receivers 312. Thetransmitter 310 and the receiver 312 may be any suitable type oftransmitters and receivers. In one embodiment, the transmitter 310 andthe receiver 312 may be part of a transceiver.

Certain configurations, such as 5G networks, may be adopted forconnectivity and wireless automation in a factory floor in which avariety of machines, robots, actuators, and terminals may communicateand serve different applications such as control-to-controlcommunication, motion control, mobile control panels, mobile robots,and/or process automation applications. Some of these applications mayhave strict performance KPIs and service requirements in terms ofend-to-end latency, reliability, cycle time, ST, and so forth. ST mayindicate a time that an application consuming a communication servicemay continue without an anticipated message. For cyclic traffic, ST maybe defined as a maximum number of consecutive incorrectly received orlost messages or in terms of loss tolerance. Once a message is notsuccessfully delivered, the loss of the next messages within an ST istolerable. For many stringent IIoT use cases, the ST is equal to thecycle time, which means only the loss of one message can be tolerated.However, the ST may span several messages for other use cases.Accordingly, in certain embodiments that have ST as a QoS requirement,loss of every data packet may not be equally crucial for maintaining anuninterrupted flow of an application.

Loss tolerance may relax performance requirements in terms ofreliability and in relation to a service availability that indicateswhether a system is ready for use at a given time or is unavailable.Therefore, ST>=a transfer interval may lead to an available servicedespite the unavailability of the communication. In some embodiments,survival time may be managed outside a RAN (e.g., by a CN); however,considering very short reaction times of most stringent IIoT use cases,CN or application-based handling of survival time may be impractical.

In some embodiments, if survival time is considered a QoS requirement inRAN, then a high-resolution feedback may be used (e.g., a singlefeedback—implicit or explicit—may be sent after a number of consecutivedata packets) if a number of consecutive data packets lost is within aloss tolerance and the feedback may report whether all data packetswithin a burst are in error (e.g., “NACK” or “0” bit) or at least one ofthe data packets is successfully received and therefore not in error(e.g., “ACK” or “1” bit).

In such embodiments, before the loss tolerance is reached, a number ofpoints (e.g., after transmission of every N packets) at which thefeedback is sent may be either dynamically configured by a network orsemi-statically configured. The feedback interval may either be the sameor vary depending up on feedback scheduling. One example is shown inFIG. 4 in which the loss tolerance is 10 data packets and feedback isscheduled after every 3 packets.

Specifically, FIG. 4 is a timing diagram 400 illustrating one embodimentof high-resolution feedback having a fixed interval. The timing diagram400 is illustrated over time 402. At a first time 404 a first DL datapacket P1 is received correctly, at a second time 406 a second DL datapacket P2 is not received correctly, at a third time 408 a third DL datapacket P3 is not received correctly, and at a fourth time 410 an UL ACKis transmitted because at least one of data packets P1, P2, and P3 wasreceived correctly. Moreover, at a fifth time 412 a fourth DL datapacket P4 is not received correctly, at a sixth time 414 a fifth DL datapacket P5 is not received correctly, at a seventh time 416 a sixth DLdata packet P6 is not received correctly, and at an eighth time 418 anUL NACK is transmitted because all of the data packets P4, P5, and P6were not received correctly. Furthermore, at a ninth time 420 a seventhDL data packet P7 is not received correctly, at a tenth time 422 aneighth DL data packet P8 is not received correctly, at an eleventh time424 a ninth DL data packet P9 is received correctly, and at a twelfthtime 426 an UL ACK is transmitted because at least one of data packetsP7, P8, and P9 was received correctly. At a thirteenth time 428 a tenthDL data packet P10 is not received correctly. Thus, loss tolerance canbe monitored by reporting after every three DL data packets instead ofafter every DL data packet, thereby reducing feedback resources used.

Another example of a feedback interval in shown in FIG. 5 in which theloss tolerance is 10 data packets and the feedback is scheduled atirregular intervals (e.g., first feedback after the first 4 datapackets, then second feedback after 3 subsequent data packets, and thirdfeedback after 2 subsequent data packets).

Specifically, FIG. 5 is a timing diagram 500 illustrating one embodimentof high-resolution feedback having a variable interval. The timingdiagram 500 is illustrated over time 502. At a first time 504 a first DLdata packet P1 is received correctly, at a second time 506 a second DLdata packet P2 is not received correctly, at a third time 508 a third DLdata packet P3 is not received correctly, at a fourth time 510 a fourthDL data packet P4 is not received correctly, and at a fifth time 512 anUL ACK is transmitted because at least one of data packets P1, P2, P3,and P4 was received correctly. Moreover, at a sixth time 514 a fifth DLdata packet P5 is not received correctly, at a seventh time 516 a sixthDL data packet P6 is not received correctly, at an eighth time 518 aseventh DL data packet P7 is not received correctly, and at a ninth time520 an UL NACK is transmitted because all of the data packets P5, P6,and P7 were not received correctly. Furthermore, at a tenth time 522 aneighth DL data packet P8 is not received correctly, at an eleventh time524 a ninth DL data packet P9 is received correctly, and at a twelfthtime 526 an UL ACK is transmitted because at least one of data packetsP8 and P9 was received correctly. At a thirteenth time 528 a tenth DLdata packet P10 is not received correctly. Thus, loss tolerance can bemonitored by reporting after an interval of DL data packets instead ofafter every DL data packet, thereby reducing feedback resources used.

As may be appreciated, regarding the embodiments described in relationto FIG. 4 and FIG. 5, feedback signaling is reduced and power consumedmay also be reduced.

In some embodiments, if survival time is a QoS requirement in RAN, thenfeedback may be enhanced so that a receiver reports a counter to atransmitter. In such embodiments, a number of consecutive data packetslost to be reported may be within a loss tolerance and the counter mayindicate a last consecutive number of packets lost.

In certain embodiments, before a loss tolerance is reached, a number ofpoints (e.g., after transmission of every N packets) at which feedbackis sent may be either dynamically configured by a network orsemi-statically configured. The feedback interval may either be the sameor may vary depending up on feedback scheduling. The feedback includes anumber of last consecutive data packets loss so that the transmitter mayuse this information to avoid reaching the loss tolerance by schedulingmore frequent feedback for subsequent data packets. In such embodiments,dynamic configuration may be used. FIG. 6 illustrates one example inwhich the loss tolerance is 5 data packets.

Specifically, FIG. 6 is a timing diagram 600 illustrating one embodimentof dynamically adjusted high-resolution feedback. The timing diagram 600is illustrated over time 602. At a first time 604 a first DL data packetP1 is received correctly and a counter that indicates a last consecutivenumber of packets lost is zero, at a second time 606 a second DL datapacket P2 is not received correctly and the counter increments to one,at a third time 608 a third DL data packet P3 is not received correctlyand the counter increments to two, at a fourth time 610 the countervalue of two is transmitted because that is the last consecutive numberof packets lost. Moreover, at a fifth time 612 a fourth DL data packetP4 is received correctly so the counter is reset to zero, and at a sixthtime 614 the counter value of zero is transmitted because that is thelast consecutive number of packets lost. At a seventh time 616 a fifthDL data packet P5 is received correctly so the counter stays at zero, atan eighth time 618 a sixth DL data packet P6 is received correctly sothe counter stays at zero, at a ninth time 620 a seventh DL data packetP7 is not received correctly so the counter increments to one, and at atenth time 622 the counter value of one is transmitted because that isthe last consecutive number of packets lost. Furthermore, at an eleventhtime 624 an eighth DL data packet P8 is not received correctly so thecounter increments to two, at a twelfth time 626 a ninth DL data packetP9 is received correctly so the counter resets to zero, and at athirteenth time 628 the counter value of zero is transmitted becausethat is the last consecutive number of packets lost. At a fourteenthtime 630 a tenth DL data packet P10 is received correctly so the counterstays at zero. Thus, loss tolerance can be monitored by reporting afteran interval of DL data packets instead of after every DL data packet,thereby reducing feedback resources used.

As illustrated in FIG. 6, the first feedback is scheduled after thefirst 3 data packets. As explained above, the first data packet was asuccess, but the second and third data packets were failures, so thereceiver reported a counter value of 2. Based on this, the transmitterknows that if there are 3 more continuous data packets lost, then theapplication will go to downtime. Therefore, the transmitter may use thisinformation and schedule the next feedback before that, which is after 1subsequent data packet. Now this data packet (data packet 4) was asuccess and so the receiver sends back the counter value 0 that meansnow the loss tolerance is avoided, the counter is reset, and thetransmitted may again have a coarse feedback (e.g., after the next 3data packets) as shown.

In embodiments such as found in FIG. 6, additional information isreported back to a transmitter via a counter, and the transmitter mayuse this information to more efficiently schedule feedback and/or othertransmissions.

In various embodiments, if survival time is a QoS requirement in a RANand a loss tolerance is approaching, then a reliability of schedulingDCI, transmission of packets, and/or transmission of feedback may beincreased by adaptively increasing a higher number of repetitions and/orretransmissions in comparison to a last burst of transmission.

In some embodiments, when and how to configure repetitions and/orretransmissions for efficient resource scheduling may be determinedbased on feedback. In such embodiments, as the loss tolerance approachesdue to an increasing number of consecutive lost data packets, a numberof repetitions and/or retransmissions may be increased to have morerobust transmissions and avoid further failures. Such embodiments mayfacilitate resource efficient repetitions and/or retransmissiondepending upon a closeness of a number of consecutive lost data packetsto a loss tolerance. As may be appreciated, embodiments described hereinmay be individually applied or applied in combination.

In certain embodiments, if multiple DL packets are transmitted frommultiple TRPs to a UE, and if a number of consecutive data packets lostreaches a certain threshold, then repetition may be applied tosubsequent data packets from multiple TRPs.

In one embodiment, a gNB schedules consecutive new DL packets of a radiobearer from multiple TRPs to a UE in which one UL feedback resource isconfigured for joint and/or single feedback to be transmitted to aprimary TRP or one of the TRPs for multiple DL packets.

One implementation of this embodiment is illustrated in FIG. 7 in whicheach TRP transmits different DL packet to a UE and a number of TRPsconfigured depends on a loss tolerance.

Specifically, FIG. 7 is a communication diagram 700 illustrating oneembodiment of communications in which multiple TRPs transmit consecutiveDL packets. The communications 700 may include communications between afirst TRP 702, a second TRP 704, a third TRP 706, a fourth TRP 708, anda UE 710. As may be appreciated, descriptions of communications 700contained herein may refer to one or more messages transmitted betweendevices.

In one embodiment, in a first communication 712 transmitted from thefirst TRP 702 to the UE 710, the first TRP 702 may transmit a first datapacket to the UE 710. In some embodiments, in a second communication 714transmitted from the second TRP 704 to the UE 710, the second TRP 704may transmit a second data packet to the UE 710. In various embodiments,in a third communication 716 transmitted from the UE 710 to the firstTRP 702, the UE 710 may transmit a low-resolution feedback to the firstTRP 702. The first TRP 702 may be configured as a primary TRP thatreceives all feedback messages from the UE 716.

In certain embodiments, in a fourth communication 718 transmitted fromthe third TRP 706 to the UE 710, the third TRP 706 may transmit a thirddata packet to the UE 710. In some embodiments, in a fifth communication720 transmitted from the fourth TRP 708 to the UE 710, the fourth TRP708 may transmit a fourth data packet to the UE 710. In variousembodiments, in a sixth communication 722 transmitted from the UE 710 tothe first TRP 702, the UE 710 may transmit a low-resolution feedback tothe first TRP 702.

In one embodiment, in a seventh communication 724 transmitted from thefirst TRP 702 to the UE 710, the first TRP 702 may transmit a fifth datapacket to the UE 710. In some embodiments, in an eighth communication726 transmitted from the second TRP 704 to the UE 710, the second TRP704 may transmit a sixth data packet to the UE 710. In variousembodiments, in a ninth communication 728 transmitted from the UE 710 tothe first TRP 702, the UE 710 may transmit a low-resolution feedback tothe first TRP 702.

In certain embodiments, in a tenth communication 730 transmitted fromthe third TRP 706 to the UE 710, the third TRP 706 may transmit aseventh data packet to the UE 710. In some embodiments, in an eleventhcommunication 732 transmitted from the fourth TRP 708 to the UE 710, thefourth TRP 708 may transmit an eighth data packet to the UE 710. Invarious embodiments, in a twelfth communication 734 transmitted from theUE 710 to the first TRP 702, the UE 710 may transmit a low-resolutionfeedback to the first TRP 702.

As may be appreciated, the feedback resource used for the low-resolutionfeedback may not necessarily be related to L1 HARQ feedback or a requestfor retransmission, but the feedback resource may be related to an errorstate or downtime of a communication system after failing to receive nconsecutive DL packets.

In certain embodiments, each feedback resource is configured after n DLpackets wherein n<loss tolerance. The feedback resource may be an L1feedback that may be periodically configured in PUCCH, L2 feedback aspart of a MAC CE, L3 feedback as part of RLC, or a PDCP status report.

In some embodiments, a repetition may be dynamically configured orsemi-statically configured repetitions may be activated after a numberof consecutive lost data packets reaches a certain threshold.

In various embodiments, a primary TRP may be defined or assumed by a UEas follows: 1) for single DCI based M-TRP operation, a TRP associatedwith transmission of DCI may be the primary TRP (e.g., by associatingDCI with a CORESETPOOLIndex and with TRP (e.g., TCI state)); 2) formulti DCI based M-TRP operation and joint feedback, the primary TRP maybe defined as one that is associated with the CORESETPOOLIndex that hasCORESET with a DCI having PUCCH resources (and related parameters suchas DAI) for joint feedback transmission; and/or 3) the primary TRP maybe assumed to be the TRP associated with a first TCI state that isindicated in the DCI.

In the feedback resource, the UE 710 reports a ‘0’ or ‘no error’ if oneof n data packets was correctly received and reports ‘1’ or ‘error’ ifall n data packets were lost. Upon receiving the feedback ‘1’ or errorfrom the UE 710, the first TRP 702 may configure repetitions for an(n+1)^(th) DL data packet from multiple TRPs to enhance the reliabilityas shown in FIG. 8.

Specifically, FIG. 8 is a communication diagram illustrating oneembodiment of communications 800 in which packet repetition is used inresponse to a feedback error. The communications 800 may includecommunications between a first TRP 802, a second TRP 804, a third TRP806, a fourth TRP 808, and a UE 810. As may be appreciated, descriptionsof communications 800 contained herein may refer to one or more messagestransmitted between devices.

In one embodiment, in a first communication 812 transmitted from thefirst TRP 802 to the UE 810, the first TRP 802 may transmit a first datapacket to the UE 810 that the UE 810 does not successfully receive. Insome embodiments, in a second communication 814 transmitted from thesecond TRP 804 to the UE 810, the second TRP 804 may transmit a seconddata packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 does not successfully receive.In various embodiments, in a third communication 816 transmitted fromthe third TRP 806 to the UE 810, the third TRP 806 may transmit a thirddata packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 does not successfully receive.In certain embodiments, in a fourth communication 818 transmitted fromthe UE 810 to the first TRP 802, the UE 810 may transmit alow-resolution feedback to the first TRP 802. The first TRP 802 may beconfigured as a primary TRP that receives all feedback messages from theUE 816. The low-resolution feedback may indicate a ‘1’ or an errorbecause the UE 810 did not receive any of the first, second, and thirddata packets correctly.

In some embodiments, in response to the error indication, in a fifthcommunication 820 transmitted (e.g., concurrently and/or simultaneously)from the first TRP 802, the second TRP 804, the third TRP 806, and thefourth TRP 808 to the UE 810, the first TRP 802, the second TRP 804, thethird TRP 806, and the fourth TRP 808 may transmit a fourth data packetto the UE 810 from the multiple TRPs to facilitate redundancy and a highlikelihood that that data packet is received correctly. In thisembodiment, at least one repetition of the data packet is receivedcorrectly. In various embodiments, in a sixth communication 822transmitted from the first TRP 802 to the UE 810, the first TRP 802 maytransmit a fifth data packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 successfullyreceives. In one embodiment, in a seventh communication 824 transmittedfrom the second TRP 804 to the UE 810, the second TRP 804 may transmit asixth data packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 successfully receives.In some embodiments, in an eighth communication 826 transmitted from theUE 810 to the first TRP 802, the UE 810 may transmit a low-resolutionfeedback to the first TRP 802. The low-resolution feedback may indicatea ‘0’ or no error because the UE 810 received at least one of thefourth, fifth, and sixth data packets correctly.

In various embodiments, in a ninth communication 828 transmitted fromthe third TRP 806 to the UE 810, the third TRP 806 may transmit aseventh data packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 successfully receives.In certain embodiments, in a tenth communication 830 transmitted fromthe fourth TRP 808 to the UE 810, the fourth TRP 808 may transmit aneighth data packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 does not successfullyreceive. In some embodiments, in an eleventh communication 832transmitted from the first TRP 802 to the UE 810, the first TRP 802 maytransmit a ninth data packet to the UE 810 that the UE 810 successfullyreceives. In various embodiments, in a twelfth communication 834transmitted from the UE 810 to the first TRP 802, the UE 810 maytransmit a low-resolution feedback to the first TRP 802. Thelow-resolution feedback may indicate a ‘0’ or no error because the UE810 received at least one of the seventh, eighth, and ninth data packetscorrectly.

In certain embodiments, a gNB may derive an error state based only onACK/NACK of n consecutive data packets. If HARQ is configured, the gNBmay declare an error state after consuming all HARQ retransmissions forthe n packets, as shown in FIG. 9.

Specifically, FIG. 9 is a communication diagram illustrating oneembodiment of communications 900 including error state extraction basedon HARQ. The communications 900 may include communications between afirst TRP 902, a second TRP 904, a third TRP 906, a fourth TRP 908, anda UE 910. As may be appreciated, descriptions of communications 900contained herein may refer to one or more messages transmitted betweendevices.

In one embodiment, in a first communication 912 transmitted from thefirst TRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may transmit a first datapacket to the UE 910. In some embodiments, in a second communication 914transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, the UE 910 maytransmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet was receivedcorrectly. The first TRP 902 may be configured as a primary TRP thatreceives all feedback messages from the UE 916. In this example, the UE910 transmits NACK to indicate that the data packet was not receivedcorrectly. In various embodiments, in a third communication 916transmitted from the first TRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 mayalso transmit the first data packet to the UE 910. In certainembodiments, in a fourth communication 918 transmitted from the UE 910to the first TRP 902, the UE 910 may transmit ACK/NACK to indicatewhether the data packet was received correctly. In this example, the UE910 transmits NACK to indicate that the data packet was not receivedcorrectly.

In one embodiment, in a fifth communication 920 transmitted from thefirst TRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may also transmit thefirst data packet to the UE 910. In some embodiments, in a sixthcommunication 922 transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, theUE 910 may transmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet wasreceived correctly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits NACK toindicate that the data packet was not received correctly. In variousembodiments, in a seventh communication 924 transmitted from the firstTRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may also transmit the firstdata packet to the UE 910. In certain embodiments, in an eighthcommunication 926 transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, theUE 910 may transmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet wasreceived correctly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits NACK toindicate that the data packet was not received correctly. The first TRP902 may determine 928 a number of consecutive data packets lost andcompare this to a number n. For this example, n=8 and the number ofconsecutive data packets lost is 4, so no change in action is made.

In one embodiment, in a ninth communication 930 transmitted from thefirst TRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may transmit a seconddata packet to the UE 910. In some embodiments, in a tenth communication932 transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, the UE 910 maytransmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet was receivedcorrectly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits NACK to indicate thatthe data packet was not received correctly. In various embodiments, inan eleventh communication 934 transmitted from the first TRP 902 to theUE 910, the first TRP 902 may also transmit the second data packet tothe UE 910. In certain embodiments, in a twelfth communication 936transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, the UE 910 maytransmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet was receivedcorrectly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits NACK to indicate thatthe data packet was not received correctly.

In one embodiment, in a thirteenth communication 938 transmitted fromthe first TRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may also transmit thesecond data packet to the UE 910. In some embodiments, in a fourteenthcommunication 940 transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, theUE 910 may transmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet wasreceived correctly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits NACK toindicate that the data packet was not received correctly. In variousembodiments, in a fifteenth communication 942 transmitted from the firstTRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may also transmit the seconddata packet to the UE 910. In certain embodiments, in a sixteenthcommunication 944 transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, theUE 910 may transmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the data packet wasreceived correctly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits NACK toindicate that the data packet was not received correctly. The first TRP902 may determine 946 a number of consecutive data packets lost andcompare this to a number n. For this example, n=8 and the number ofconsecutive data packets lost is 8, so the first TRP triggers an errorstate. In a seventeenth communication 948, the first TRP 902 indicatesthe error state to the second TRP 904 so that the following data packetsare transmitted from different TRPs. In an eighteenth communication 950,the first TRP 902 indicates the error state to the third TRP 906 so thatthe following data packets are transmitted from different TRPs. In anineteenth communication 952, the first TRP 902 indicates the errorstate to the fourth TRP 908 so that the following data packets aretransmitted from different TRPs.

In one embodiment, in a twentieth communication 954 transmitted from thefirst TRP 902 to the UE 910, the first TRP 902 may transmit a third datapacket to the UE 910. In various embodiments, in a twenty-firstcommunication 956 transmitted from the second TRP 904 to the UE 910, thesecond TRP 904 may also transmit the third data packet to the UE 910. Inone embodiment, in a twenty-second communication 958 transmitted fromthe third TRP 906 to the UE 910, the third TRP 906 may also transmit thethird data packet to the UE 910. In various embodiments, in atwenty-third communication 960 transmitted from the fourth TRP 908 tothe UE 910, the fourth TRP 908 may also transmit the third data packetto the UE 910. In certain embodiments, in a twenty-fourth communication962 transmitted from the UE 910 to the first TRP 902, the UE 910 maytransmit ACK/NACK to indicate whether the third data packet was receivedcorrectly. In this example, the UE 910 transmits ACK to indicate thatthe third data packet was received correctly.

In various embodiments, if DL packets are transmitted from single TRPsto a UE and if a number of consecutive data packets lost reaches acertain threshold, then either repetition is applied to subsequent datapackets from multiple TRPs or the subsequent packet is transmitted froma different TRP.

In one embodiment, a gNB schedules consecutive new DL packets of a radiobearer from a single TRP to a UE in which one UL feedback resource isconfigured for a single and/or joint feedback for multiple packets. Incertain embodiments, a TRP transmits DL packets to a UE.

As may be appreciated, a feedback resource may not necessarily berelated to L1 HARQ feedback or a request for retransmissions, but thefeedback resource may be related to an error state or downtime of acommunication system after failing to receive n consecutive DL packets.

In certain embodiments, each feedback resource is configured after n DLpackets wherein n<loss tolerance. The feedback resource may be an L1feedback that may be periodically configured in PUCCH, L2 feedback aspart of a MAC CE, L3 feedback as part of RLC, or a PDCP status report.

In various embodiments, in the feedback resource a UE reports ‘0’ or ‘noerror’ which means that one of n packets was correctly received, andreports ‘1’ or ‘error’ if all n packets are lost.

Upon receiving the feedback ‘1’ or error from the UE, a TRP may enableother TRPs to jointly transmit (n+1)th DL data packet to enhancereliability. In such embodiments, the TRP may transmit (n+1)th DL datapacket from another TRP that has better link quality based on a CSIreport from a UE, wherein the CSI report may be either separately orjointly sent to corresponding TRPs or the primary TRP.

In some embodiments, a TRP may derive an error state based only onACK/NACK from n consecutive data packets. If HARQ is configured, the TRPdeclares an error state after consuming all HARQ retransmissions for then packets and may configure M-TRP joint transmission of the followingpacket or apply different time or frequency repetitions, as described inFIG. 9.

In various embodiments, a TRP may intentionally discard or preempttransmission of one or more DL data packets if the previous data packetswere successfully received, as shown in FIG. 10.

Specifically, FIG. 10 is a communication diagram illustrating oneembodiment of communications 1000 that may include DL packet discarding.The communications 1000 may include communications between a first TRP1002, a second TRP 1004, a third TRP 1006, a fourth TRP 1008, and a UE1010. As may be appreciated, descriptions of communications 1000contained herein may refer to one or more messages transmitted betweendevices.

In one embodiment, in a first communication 1012 transmitted from thefirst TRP 1002 to the UE 1010, the first TRP 1002 may transmit a firstdata packet to the UE 1010. In some embodiments, in a secondcommunication 1014 transmitted from the second TRP 1004 to the UE 1010,the second TRP 1004 may transmit a second data packet to the UE 1010. Invarious embodiments, in a third communication 1016 transmitted from theUE 1010 to the first TRP 1002, the UE 1010 may transmit a low-resolutionfeedback to the first TRP 1002. The first TRP 1002 may be configured asa primary TRP that receives all feedback messages from the UE 1016. Inthe present embodiment, the feedback may indicate that there is noerror.

In certain embodiments, in a fourth communication 1018 transmitted fromthe third TRP 1006 to the UE 1010, the third TRP 1006 may transmit athird data packet to the UE 1010. In the present embodiment, the fourthcommunication 1018 may be skipped (e.g., discarded, preempted, bypassed)because the third communication 1016 indicated that there was no error.In such an embodiment, the loss tolerance may be 4 data packets, so ifthere is no error in 2 data packets, 1 data packet may be skipped. Insome embodiments, in a fifth communication 1020 transmitted from thefourth TRP 1008 to the UE 1010, the fourth TRP 1008 may transmit afourth data packet to the UE 1010. In various embodiments, in a sixthcommunication 1022 transmitted from the UE 1010 to the first TRP 1002,the UE 1010 may transmit a low-resolution feedback to the first TRP1002. In the present embodiment, the feedback may indicate that there isno error.

In one embodiment, in a seventh communication 1024 transmitted from thefirst TRP 1002 to the UE 1010, the first TRP 1002 may transmit a fifthdata packet to the UE 1010. In some embodiments, in an eighthcommunication 1026 transmitted from the second TRP 1004 to the UE 1010,the second TRP 1004 may transmit a sixth data packet to the UE 1010. Inthe present embodiment, the eighth communication 1026 may be skipped(e.g., discarded, preempted, bypassed) because the sixth communication1022 indicated that there was no error. In such an embodiment, the losstolerance may be 4 data packets, so if there is no error in 2 datapackets, 1 data packet may be skipped. In various embodiments, in aninth communication 1028 transmitted from the UE 1010 to the first TRP1002, the UE 1010 may transmit a low-resolution feedback to the firstTRP 1002. In the present embodiment, the feedback may indicate thatthere is no error.

In certain embodiments, in a tenth communication 1030 transmitted fromthe third TRP 1006 to the UE 1010, the third TRP 1006 may transmit aseventh data packet to the UE 1010. In some embodiments, in an eleventhcommunication 1032 transmitted from the fourth TRP 1008 to the UE 1010,the fourth TRP 1008 may transmit an eighth data packet to the UE 1010.In various embodiments, in a twelfth communication 1034 transmitted fromthe UE 1010 to the first TRP 1002, the UE 1010 may transmit alow-resolution feedback to the first TRP 1002. In the presentembodiment, the feedback may indicate that there is no error.

In certain embodiments, a gNB schedules consecutive new DL packets of aradio bearer from multiple TRPs to a UE. In such embodiments, one ULfeedback resource may be configured for joint and/or single feedback tobe transmitted to a primary TRP or one of the TRPs for multiple DLpackets.

In some embodiments, each TRP transmits different DL packet to the UEand the number of TRPs configured depends on a loss tolerance.

In various embodiments, a feedback resource is not related to L1 HARQfeedback or request for retransmissions but the feedback is related toan error state or downtime of a communication system after failing toreceive n consecutive DL packets.

In certain embodiments, each feedback resource is configured after n DLpackets wherein n<loss tolerance. The feedback resource may be an L1feedback which could be periodically configured in PUCCH, L2 feedback aspart of a MAC CE, L3 feedback as part of RLC, or a PDCP status report.

In some embodiments, a primary TRP may be defined or assumed by a UE asfollows: 1) for single DCI based M-TRP operation, a TRP associated withtransmission of DCI may be considered the primary TRP, where theprinciple of associating DCI with a CORESETPOOLIndex and with TRP (e.g.,TCI state) may be applied; 2) for multi DCI based M-TRP operation andjoint feedback, the primary TRP may be defined as one that is associatedwith the CORESETPOOLIndex that has CORESET with DCI having PUCCHresources (and related parameters such as DAI) for joint feedbacktransmission; and/or 3) the primary TRP may be assumed to be the TRPassociated with a first TCI state that is indicated in the DCI.

In various embodiments, a UE reports in a feedback resource ‘0’ or ‘noerror’ if one of n packets was correctly received and reports ‘1’ or‘error’ if all n packets are lost. Upon receiving a feedback of ‘1’ orerror from the UE, a gNB may configure joint transmission for (n+1)th DLpacket from multiple TRPs to enhance reliability. Upon receivingfeedback ‘0’ or ‘no error’ from a UE, the gNB may discard some of thefollowing messages and allocate the resources for another UE that is inan error state.

In certain embodiments, a gNB may derive an error state based only onACK/NACK of n consecutive data packets. If HARQ is configured, the gNBmay declare an error state after consuming all HARQ retransmissions forthe n packets. It should be noted that as used herein gNB may refer to aTRP and/or a TRP may be a gNB.

In some embodiments, single and/or joint feedback may be repeated usingM-TRP after n consecutive DL packets are lost. In such embodiments, therepetition may either be in SDM, FDM, or TDM manner.

In various embodiments, if DL packets are transmitted from single TRPsto a UE and if a number of consecutive data packets lost reaches acertain threshold, then a number of repetition and/or retransmissionsmay be increased in L1 for subsequent DL packets.

In certain embodiments, L1 repetition and/or retransmission is notenabled in L1 and if a low-resolution feedback indicates an error, thenrepetition and/or retransmission is enabled for at least a subsequent DLpacket. In some embodiments, repetition and/or retransmission is doneusing the same transmission parameters, such as the same MCS, used forprevious DL packets.

In various embodiments, repetition and/or retransmission is done usingat least some different transmission parameters, such as a lower MCS, incomparison to previous DL packets. In certain embodiments, repetitionand/or retransmission is done from a single TRP. In some embodiments,repetition and/or retransmission is done from multiple TRPs.

In various embodiments, multiple threshold values for a number ofconsecutive data packets lost are configured by a network. In suchembodiments, with every increasing threshold value, a number ofrepetitions and/or retransmissions may be increased.

In certain embodiments, a single TRP is used for multiple repetitionsand/or retransmissions. In some embodiments, a number of TRPs used forrepetition for subsequent data packets may gradually increase with everyincreased threshold value. For example, the number TRPs may be directlyproportional to the number of repetitions and/or retransmissions.

In various embodiments, if multiple threshold values are configured by anetwork in terms of a number of consecutive data packets lost and iffeedback received by a gNB at a given threshold value is not in error,then a threshold counter may be reset and a number of repetitions forsubsequent data packets may be reduced.

In certain embodiments, if multiple UL packets are transmitted frommultiple panels of a UE (e.g., as shown in FIG. 11) and if a number ofconsecutive data packets lost reaches a certain threshold, thenrepetition may be applied to subsequent data packets from at least morethan one panel.

Specifically, FIG. 11 is a communication diagram illustrating oneembodiment of communications 1100 in which there is consecutive ULpacket transmission to multiple TRPs. The communications 1100 mayinclude communications between a first TRP 1102, a second TRP 1104, athird TRP 1106, a fourth TRP 1108, and a UE 1110. As may be appreciated,descriptions of communications 1100 contained herein may refer to one ormore messages transmitted between devices.

In one embodiment, in a first communication 1112 transmitted from the UE1110 to the first TRP 1102, the UE 1110 may transmit a first data packetto the first TRP 1102. In some embodiments, in a second communication1114 transmitted from the UE 1110 to the second TRP 1104, the UE 1110may transmit a second data packet to the second TRP 1104. In variousembodiments, in a third communication 1116 transmitted from the UE 1110to the third TRP 1106, the UE 1110 may transmit a third data packet tothe third TRP 1106. In certain embodiments, in a fourth communication1118 transmitted from the UE 1110 to the fourth TRP 1108, the UE 1110may transmit a fourth data packet to the fourth TRP 1108.

In various embodiments, for UL transmission, a UE may transmitconsecutive UL packets from multiple panels to single or multiple TRPs.Whether the UL packets are transmitted to single or multiple TRPs maydepend on an UL-ST, a number of UE panels, and a current link qualitycorresponding to the multiple TRPs. There could be different options forreacting after there are m UL failed messages, where m<UL ST. Forexample, in a first option, a lower MCS may be applied for followingpackets. As another example, in a second option, there may be repetition(e.g., FDM, SDM) in which a packet m+1 is sent from multiple panels to asingle or multiple TRPs, or TDM if a cycle time allows for repetition inintra or inter slot. To benefit from space diversity, a UE may switch aTX panel for each repetition.

In certain embodiments, if multiple UL packets are scheduled or enabled(e.g., for a configured grant) by a single DCI to be transmitted from aUE in a consecutive slots and/or mini-slots and if a number ofconsecutive data packets lost reaches a certain threshold, thenrepetition may be applied to subsequent data packets in which a numberof repetitions and resources are scheduled or enabled by a single DCI.

In various embodiments, a single panel of a UE may be used fortransmitting multiple packets to a single TRP before a certain thresholdis reached in terms of a number of consecutive data packets lost, afterwhich, multi-panel UL transmission may be enabled to: 1) use multiplepanels for repetition of a subsequent packet from all active panels; 2)use multiple panels for transmitting different data packets from allactive panels; and/or 3) use some panels for repetitions and some panelsfor different data packets. As may be appreciated, various method ofrepetition from multiple active panels may be transmitted to a single ormultiple TRPs. Furthermore, certain methods of repetition may also beimplemented by activating a configured grant from multiple antennapanels after a certain threshold is reached. The threshold may be basedon receiving a single or consecutive non-toggled NDI from a gNB UL grantor based on ACK/NACK feedback from the gNB. It should be noted that somemethods of repetition from multiple antenna panels may be implicitlyactivated based on the threshold or explicitly activated in an UL grant.

In some embodiments, a beamFailureInstanceMaxCount from a TRP may bewithin a survival time or loss tolerance value. In certain embodiments,there may be a beam loss indication from lower layers or BFI COUNTERabove certain threshold that may enable repetition of UL packets from asingle or multiple active antenna panels to single or multiple TRPs.

In various embodiments, feedback may be enhanced by, instead oftransmitting only error or no error, a UE reports a counter value. Insuch embodiments, the counter may indicate a last consecutive number ofDL packets lost.

In certain embodiments, only a counter value is reported by a UE insteadof error or no error. In some embodiments, both a counter value and abit indicating error or no error is reported.

In various embodiments, multiple thresholds may be defined along withcounter type feedback. In such embodiments, the threshold values may bedynamically changed depending on a counter feedback value. In a firstexample, if a loss tolerance is 10, then a UE may report first feedbackafter 5 data packets. If the counter feedback is 5, for example, thenthe UE may report second feedback after the next 2 data packets. In asecond example, if a loss tolerance is 10, then a UE may report firstfeedback after 5 data packets. If the counter feedback is 0, forexample, then the UE may report second feedback after the next 5 datapackets.

As described in various embodiments found herein: 1) ST basederror-handling feedback may be different than L1 HARQ, wherein a gNB mayconfigure a UE to trigger an error state after a certain number offailed packets n (n<ST in terms of maximum allowed consecutive lostpackets—for example, n may be less than the survival time); 2) aniterative repetition scheme may be used in which a number of repetitionsis increased gradually depending upon a number of consecutive lostpackets (this may enable efficient resource utilization by avoiding anunnecessary number of repetitions if the number of packets lost is lowerthan configured threshold values; 3) ST based switching between singleTRP and multi-TRP operation may be used for DL transmission; and/or 4)ST based switching between single panel and multi-panel operation may beused for UL transmission.

FIG. 12 is a flow chart diagram illustrating one embodiment of a method1200 for consecutive data packet feedback. In some embodiments, themethod 1200 is performed by an apparatus, such as the remote unit 102.In certain embodiments, the method 1200 may be performed by a processorexecuting program code, for example, a microcontroller, amicroprocessor, a CPU, a GPU, an auxiliary processing unit, a FPGA, orthe like.

The method 1200 may include receiving 1202 a first set of consecutivedata packets. In certain embodiments, the method 1200 includestransmitting 1204 feedback corresponding to the first set of consecutivedata packets, wherein the feedback comprises: an error indication inresponse each data packet in the first set of consecutive data packetsfailing to be received correctly; a non-error indication in response toat least one data packet in the first set of consecutive data packetsbeing received correctly; a counter value that indicates a consecutivenumber of data packet failures; or some combination thereof.

In certain embodiments, the method 1200 further comprises receiving asecond set of consecutive data packets after receiving the first set ofconsecutive data packets, wherein the second set of consecutive datapackets are transmitted from a plurality of transmission points inresponse to: the feedback comprising the error indication, the countervalue being greater than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof and the first set of consecutive data packets being transmittedfrom a single transmission point. In some embodiments, the method 1200further comprises receiving a second set of consecutive data packetsafter receiving the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein thesecond set of consecutive data packets are repeatedly transmitted from asingle transmission point in response to the feedback comprising theerror indication, the counter value being greater than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof.

In various embodiments, the method 1200 further comprises receiving asecond set of consecutive data packets after receiving the first set ofconsecutive data packets, wherein the second set of consecutive datapackets are repeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmissionpoints in response to: the feedback comprising the error indication, thecounter value being greater than a predetermined threshold, or acombination thereof and the first set of consecutive data packets beingtransmitted from the plurality of transmission points. In oneembodiment, the method 1200 further comprises receiving a second set ofconsecutive data packets after receiving the first set of consecutivedata packets, wherein the second set of consecutive data packets arerepeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmission points inresponse to the feedback comprising the error indication, the countervalue being greater than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof.

In certain embodiments, the method 1200 further comprises configuring aplurality of thresholds that each indicate a number of consecutive datapackets possible in the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein anumber of times the second set of consecutive data packets isretransmitted corresponds to each threshold of the plurality ofthresholds. In some embodiments, the method 1200 further comprisesreducing or maintaining a number of retransmissions of the second set ofconsecutive data packets in response to the feedback comprising thenon-error indication, the counter value being less than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof.

FIG. 13 is a flow chart diagram illustrating another embodiment of amethod 1300 for consecutive data packet feedback. In some embodiments,the method 1300 is performed by an apparatus, such as the network unit104. In certain embodiments, the method 1300 may be performed by aprocessor executing program code, for example, a microcontroller, amicroprocessor, a CPU, a GPU, an auxiliary processing unit, a FPGA, orthe like.

The method 1300 may include configuring 1302 a first plurality of uplinkdata packets consecutively. In certain embodiments, the method 1300includes counting 1304 a number of consecutive data packets of the firstplurality of uplink data packets lost from a user equipment. In someembodiments, the method 1300 includes, in response to the number ofconsecutive data packets reaching a predetermined threshold, configuring1306 repetition of subsequent uplink data packets transmitted from theuser equipment.

In certain embodiments, the first plurality of uplink data packets isconfigured in a configured grant resource or using downlink controlinformation. In some embodiments, the repetition of subsequent uplinkdata packets is transmitted from multiple panels of the user equipmentin response to the number of consecutive data packets reaching thepredetermined threshold. In various embodiments, a second plurality ofuplink data packets is transmitted from multiple panels of the userequipment in response to the number of consecutive data packets reachingthe predetermined threshold.

FIG. 14 is a flow chart diagram illustrating a further embodiment of amethod 1400 for consecutive data packet feedback. In some embodiments,the method 1400 is performed by an apparatus, such as the remote unit102 and/or the network unit 104. In certain embodiments, the method 1400may be performed by a processor executing program code, for example, amicrocontroller, a microprocessor, a CPU, a GPU, an auxiliary processingunit, a FPGA, or the like.

The method 1400 may include configuring 1402 a first plurality of datapackets to be transmitted consecutively. In certain embodiments, themethod 400 includes determining 1404 a number of consecutive datapackets of the first plurality of data packets lost. In someembodiments, the method 1400 includes, in response to the number ofconsecutive data packets being less than a predetermined threshold,reducing 1406 a number of subsequent data packets to be transmittedconsecutively.

In certain embodiments, the first plurality of data packets comprisesuplink data packets. In some embodiments, the first plurality of datapackets comprises downlink data packets.

In one embodiment, a method comprises: receiving a first set ofconsecutive data packets; and transmitting feedback corresponding to thefirst set of consecutive data packets, wherein the feedback comprises:an error indication in response each data packet in the first set ofconsecutive data packets failing to be received correctly; a non-errorindication in response to at least one data packet in the first set ofconsecutive data packets being received correctly; a counter value thatindicates a consecutive number of data packet failures; or somecombination thereof.

In certain embodiments, the method further comprises receiving a secondset of consecutive data packets after receiving the first set ofconsecutive data packets, wherein the second set of consecutive datapackets are transmitted from a plurality of transmission points inresponse to: the feedback comprising the error indication, the countervalue being greater than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof and the first set of consecutive data packets being transmittedfrom a single transmission point.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises receiving a second setof consecutive data packets after receiving the first set of consecutivedata packets, wherein the second set of consecutive data packets arerepeatedly transmitted from a single transmission point in response tothe feedback comprising the error indication, the counter value beinggreater than a predetermined threshold, or a combination thereof.

In various embodiments, the method further comprises receiving a secondset of consecutive data packets after receiving the first set ofconsecutive data packets, wherein the second set of consecutive datapackets are repeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmissionpoints in response to: the feedback comprising the error indication, thecounter value being greater than a predetermined threshold, or acombination thereof; and the first set of consecutive data packets beingtransmitted from the plurality of transmission points.

In one embodiment, the method further comprises receiving a second setof consecutive data packets after receiving the first set of consecutivedata packets, wherein the second set of consecutive data packets arerepeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmission points inresponse to the feedback comprising the error indication, the countervalue being greater than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof.

In certain embodiments, the method further comprises configuring aplurality of thresholds that each indicate a number of consecutive datapackets possible in the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein anumber of times the second set of consecutive data packets isretransmitted corresponds to each threshold of the plurality ofthresholds.

In some embodiments, the method further comprises reducing ormaintaining a number of retransmissions of the second set of consecutivedata packets in response to the feedback comprising the non-errorindication, the counter value being less than a predetermined threshold,or a combination thereof.

In one embodiment, an apparatus comprises: a receiver that receives afirst set of consecutive data packets; and a transmitter that transmitsfeedback corresponding to the first set of consecutive data packets,wherein the feedback comprises: an error indication in response eachdata packet in the first set of consecutive data packets failing to bereceived correctly; a non-error indication in response to at least onedata packet in the first set of consecutive data packets being receivedcorrectly; a counter value that indicates a consecutive number of datapacket failures; or some combination thereof.

In certain embodiments, the receiver receives a second set ofconsecutive data packets after receiving the first set of consecutivedata packets, and the second set of consecutive data packets aretransmitted from a plurality of transmission points in response to: thefeedback comprising the error indication, the counter value beinggreater than a predetermined threshold, or a combination thereof and thefirst set of consecutive data packets being transmitted from a singletransmission point.

In some embodiments, the receiver receives a second set of consecutivedata packets after receiving the first set of consecutive data packets,and the second set of consecutive data packets are repeatedlytransmitted from a single transmission point in response to the feedbackcomprising the error indication, the counter value being greater than apredetermined threshold, or a combination thereof.

In various embodiments, the receiver receives a second set ofconsecutive data packets after receiving the first set of consecutivedata packets, and the second set of consecutive data packets arerepeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmission points inresponse to: the feedback comprising the error indication, the countervalue being greater than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof and the first set of consecutive data packets being transmittedfrom the plurality of transmission points.

In one embodiment, the receiver receives a second set of consecutivedata packets after receiving the first set of consecutive data packets,and the second set of consecutive data packets are repeatedlytransmitted from a plurality of transmission points in response to thefeedback comprising the error indication, the counter value beinggreater than a predetermined threshold, or a combination thereof.

In certain embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a processor thatconfigures a plurality of thresholds that each indicate a number ofconsecutive data packets possible in the first set of consecutive datapackets, and a number of times the second set of consecutive datapackets is retransmitted corresponds to each threshold of the pluralityof thresholds.

In some embodiments, the apparatus further comprises a processor thatreduces or maintains a number of retransmissions of the second set ofconsecutive data packets in response to the feedback comprising thenon-error indication, the counter value being less than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof.

In one embodiment, a method comprises: configuring a first plurality ofuplink data packets consecutively; counting a number of consecutive datapackets of the first plurality of uplink data packets lost from a userequipment; and, in response to the number of consecutive data packetsreaching a predetermined threshold, configuring repetition of subsequentuplink data packets transmitted from the user equipment.

In certain embodiments, the first plurality of uplink data packets isconfigured in a configured grant resource or using downlink controlinformation.

In some embodiments, the repetition of subsequent uplink data packets istransmitted from multiple panels of the user equipment in response tothe number of consecutive data packets reaching the predeterminedthreshold.

In various embodiments, a second plurality of uplink data packets istransmitted from multiple panels of the user equipment in response tothe number of consecutive data packets reaching the predeterminedthreshold.

In one embodiment, an apparatus comprises: a processor that: configuresa first plurality of uplink data packets consecutively; counts a numberof consecutive data packets of the first plurality of uplink datapackets lost from a user equipment; and, in response to the number ofconsecutive data packets reaching a predetermined threshold, configuresrepetition of subsequent uplink data packets transmitted from the userequipment.

In certain embodiments, the first plurality of uplink data packets isconfigured in a configured grant resource or using downlink controlinformation.

In some embodiments, the repetition of subsequent uplink data packets istransmitted from multiple panels of the user equipment in response tothe number of consecutive data packets reaching the predeterminedthreshold.

In various embodiments, a second plurality of uplink data packets istransmitted from multiple panels of the user equipment in response tothe number of consecutive data packets reaching the predeterminedthreshold.

In one embodiment, a method comprises: configuring a first plurality ofdata packets to be transmitted consecutively; determining a number ofconsecutive data packets of the first plurality of data packets lost;and, in response to the number of consecutive data packets being lessthan a predetermined threshold, reducing a number of subsequent datapackets to be transmitted consecutively.

In certain embodiments, the first plurality of data packets comprisesuplink data packets.

In some embodiments, the first plurality of data packets comprisesdownlink data packets.

In one embodiment, an apparatus comprises: a processor that: configuresa first plurality of data packets to be transmitted consecutively;determines a number of consecutive data packets of the first pluralityof data packets lost; and, in response to the number of consecutive datapackets being less than a predetermined threshold, reduces a number ofsubsequent data packets to be transmitted consecutively.

In certain embodiments, the first plurality of data packets comprisesuplink data packets.

In some embodiments, the first plurality of data packets comprisesdownlink data packets.

Embodiments may be practiced in other specific forms. The describedembodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrativeand not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicatedby the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description. Allchanges which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of theclaims are to be embraced within their scope.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method comprising: receiving a first setof consecutive data packets; transmitting first feedback correspondingto the first set of consecutive data packets prior to receivingadditional data packets, wherein the first feedback comprises a singlebit that indicates feedback for the entire first set of consecutive datapackets, and the single bit comprises: an error indication in responseto each data packet in the first set of consecutive data packets failingto be received correctly; or a non-error indication in response to atleast one data packet in the first set of consecutive data packets beingreceived correctly; receiving a second set of consecutive data packets;and transmitting second feedback corresponding to the second set ofconsecutive data packets, wherein a second length of the second set ofconsecutive data packets is different than a first length of the firstset of consecutive data packets, and the second length is determinedbased on a loss tolerance and the first feedback.
 2. The method of claim1, further comprising receiving the second set of consecutive datapackets after receiving the first set of consecutive data packets,wherein the second set of consecutive data packets are transmitted froma plurality of transmission points in response to: the feedbackcomprising the error indication, a counter value being greater than apredetermined threshold, or a combination thereof, wherein the countervalue indicates a consecutive number of data packet failures; and thefirst set of consecutive data packets being transmitted from a singletransmission point.
 3. The method of claim 1, further comprisingreceiving the second set of consecutive data packets after receiving thefirst set of consecutive data packets, wherein the second set ofconsecutive data packets are repeatedly transmitted from a singletransmission point in response to the feedback comprising the errorindication, a counter value being greater than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof, wherein the counter value indicatesa consecutive number of data packet failures.
 4. The method of claim 1,further comprising receiving the second set of consecutive data packetsafter receiving the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein thesecond set of consecutive data packets are repeatedly transmitted from aplurality of transmission points in response to: the feedback comprisingthe error indication, a counter value being greater than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof, wherein the counter value indicatesa consecutive number of data packet failures; and the first set ofconsecutive data packets being transmitted from the plurality oftransmission points.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprisingreceiving the second set of consecutive data packets after receiving thefirst set of consecutive data packets, wherein the second set ofconsecutive data packets are repeatedly transmitted from a plurality oftransmission points in response to the feedback comprising the errorindication, a counter value being greater than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof, wherein the counter value indicatesa consecutive number of data packet failures.
 6. The method of claim 1,further comprising configuring a plurality of thresholds that eachindicate a maximum number of consecutive data packets in the first setof consecutive data packets, wherein a number of times the second set ofconsecutive data packets is repeated corresponds to each threshold ofthe plurality of thresholds.
 7. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising reducing or maintaining a number of retransmissions of thesecond set of consecutive data packets in response to the feedbackcomprising the non-error indication, a counter value being less than apredetermined threshold, or a combination thereof, wherein the countervalue indicates a consecutive number of data packet failures.
 8. Anapparatus comprising: a receiver that receives a first set ofconsecutive data packets; and a transmitter that transmits feedbackcorresponding to the first set of consecutive data packets, wherein thefeedback comprises a single bit that indicates feedback for the entirefirst set of consecutive data packets, and the single bit comprises: anerror indication in response each data packet in the first set ofconsecutive data packets failing to be received correctly; or anon-error indication in response to at least one data packet in thefirst set of consecutive data packets being received correctly; wherein:the receiver receives a second set of consecutive data packets; and thetransmitter transmits second feedback corresponding to the second set ofconsecutive data packets, wherein a second length of the second set ofconsecutive data packets is different than a first length of the firstset of consecutive data packets, and the second length is determinedbased on a loss tolerance and the first feedback.
 9. The apparatus ofclaim 8, wherein the receiver receives the second set of consecutivedata packets after receiving the first set of consecutive data packets,and the second set of consecutive data packets are transmitted from aplurality of transmission points in response to: the feedback comprisingthe error indication, a counter value being greater than a predeterminedthreshold, or a combination thereof, wherein the counter value indicatesa consecutive number of data packet failures; and the first set ofconsecutive data packets being transmitted from a single transmissionpoint.
 10. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the receiver receives thesecond set of consecutive data packets after receiving the first set ofconsecutive data packets, and the second set of consecutive data packetsare repeatedly transmitted from a single transmission point in responseto the feedback comprising the error indication, a counter value beinggreater than a predetermined threshold, or a combination thereof,wherein the counter value indicates a consecutive number of data packetfailures.
 11. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the receiver receivesthe second set of consecutive data packets after receiving the first setof consecutive data packets, and the second set of consecutive datapackets are repeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmissionpoints in response to: the feedback comprising the error indication, acounter value being greater than a predetermined threshold, or acombination thereof, wherein the counter value indicates a consecutivenumber of data packet failures; and the first set of consecutive datapackets being transmitted from the plurality of transmission points. 12.The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the receiver receives the second setof consecutive data packets after receiving the first set of consecutivedata packets, and the second set of consecutive data packets arerepeatedly transmitted from a plurality of transmission points inresponse to the feedback comprising the error indication, a countervalue being greater than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof, wherein the counter value indicates a consecutive number ofdata packet failures.
 13. The apparatus of claim 8, further comprising aprocessor that configures a plurality of thresholds that each indicate amaximum number of consecutive data packets in the first set ofconsecutive data packets, and a number of times the second set ofconsecutive data packets is repeated corresponds to each threshold ofthe plurality of thresholds.
 14. The apparatus of claim 8, furthercomprising a processor that reduces or maintains a number ofretransmissions of the second set of consecutive data packets inresponse to the feedback comprising the non-error indication, a countervalue being less than a predetermined threshold, or a combinationthereof, wherein the counter value indicates a consecutive number ofdata packet failures.
 15. A method comprising: configuring a firstplurality of uplink data packets consecutively; counting a number ofconsecutive data packets of the first plurality of uplink data packetslost from a user equipment; and in response to the number of consecutivedata packets reaching a predetermined threshold greater than one,configuring repetition of subsequent uplink data packets transmittedfrom the user equipment, wherein a second length of the subsequentuplink data packets is different than a first length of the firstplurality of uplink data packets, and the second length is determinedbased on a loss tolerance.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the firstplurality of uplink data packets is configured in a configured grantresource or using downlink control information.
 17. The method of claim15, wherein the repetition of subsequent uplink data packets istransmitted from multiple panels of the user equipment in response tothe number of consecutive data packets reaching the predeterminedthreshold.
 18. The method of claim 15, wherein a second plurality ofuplink data packets is transmitted from multiple panels of the userequipment in response to the number of consecutive data packets reachingthe predetermined threshold.
 19. A method comprising: configuring afirst plurality of data packets to be transmitted consecutively;determining a number of consecutive data packets of the first pluralityof data packets lost; and in response to the number of consecutive datapackets being less than a predetermined threshold that is greater thanone, feedback corresponding to previous data packets, or a combinationthereof, reducing a number of subsequent data packets to be transmittedconsecutively, wherein a second length of the subsequent uplink datapackets is different than a first length of the first plurality of datapackets, and the second length is determined based on a loss tolerance.20. The method of claim 19, wherein the first plurality of data packetscomprises either uplink data packets or downlink data packets.